arXiv:2607. 28698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow matching assumes fully observed training data, which many real-world applications rarely provide.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
The paper introduces a pre‑training pipeline that creates transformer‑based imputation specialists for tabular data with specific missingness patterns. By featurizing entries, generating synthetic data with configurable missingness modules, and fitting on millions of synthetic tables, the pipeline produces pattern‑specific models that outperform dedicated methods for each missingness pattern. A default model trained only on MCAR data, TabImpute, remains robust across all tested patterns, and the authors release the pipeline, models, and a new benchmark of 42 datasets and 11 missingness patterns.
arXiv:2607. 23295v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In real-world machine learning applications, incomplete observations create a fundamental challenge.
arXiv:2606. 05073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Missing value imputation is a fundamental task in machine learning, with most existing methods assuming that all missing entries correspond to unobserved regular values.
arXiv:2609.37664v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Causal Normalizing Flows (CNFs) enable causal inference from observational data given the causal structure, but they assume fully observed training dat...
arXiv:2606. 03347v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Score-based diffusion models have emerged as prominent deep generative models; however, their application to tabular data remains challenging because their backbones assume fully specified inputs, whereas real-world tabular data often contain missing values.
Missing value imputation is a fundamental task in machine learning, with most existing methods assuming that all missing entries correspond to unobserved regular values. In many real-world datasets, however, missingness may arise from two distinct sources: some entries are meaningfully missing (intrinsically absent and semantically valid), while others are missing due to the observation process and should be imputed.