arXiv AI By Kaustubh Shivshankar Shejole, Tanish Agarwal, Arpit Agarwal, Avishek Ghosh

Finding the Signal in the Spam: Jointly Learning Rewards and Worker Reliability from Pairwise Comparisons

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 10045v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The problem of learning from pairwise comparisons has been widely studied across many domains such as recommendation systems, social choice, and more recently, fine-tuning large language models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

A Probabilistic Approach for Model Alignment with Human Comparisons

The paper proposes a two‑stage framework, SL+LHF, that first learns low‑dimensional representations from noisy labeled data and then refines model alignment using human comparison feedback via a probabilistic bisection approach. It introduces the label‑noise‑to‑comparison‑accuracy (LNCA) ratio to theoretically identify when this framework outperforms pure supervised learning, showing that trading labels for comparisons reduces sample complexity when labels are scarce. Experiments on a high‑dimensional crowdfunding prediction task and an Amazon Mechanical Turk study confirm that incorporating human or large language model evaluators improves accuracy under a fixed query budget.

By Junyu Cao, Mohsen Bayati
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Efficient Adversarial Attacks on High-dimensional Offline Bandits

arXiv:2602. 01658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bandit algorithms have recently emerged as a powerful tool for evaluating machine learning models, including generative image models and large language models, by efficiently identifying top-performing candidates without exhaustive comparisons.

By Seyed Mohammad Hadi Hosseini, Amir Najafi, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

LLMAR: A Tuning-Free Recommendation Framework for Sparse and Text-Rich Industrial Domains

LLMAR is a tuning‑free recommendation framework designed for sparse, text‑rich industrial B2B domains. It transforms user behavioral history into structured semantic motives using LLM inference, employs a reflection loop to self‑correct hallucinations, and operates cost‑effectively with asynchronous batch processing. Experiments on MovieLens‑1M, Amazon Prime Pantry, and a construction risk dataset show LLMAR surpasses state‑of‑the‑art learning models, achieving up to a 54.6% nDCG@10 improvement while keeping inference costs around $1 per 1,000 users.

By Ryogo Hishikawa, Ichiro Kataoka, Shinya Yuda
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 18

Sequential Batch Learning in Finite-Action Linear Contextual Bandits

arXiv:2004. 06321v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the sequential batch learning problem in linear contextual bandits with finite action sets, where the decision maker is constrained to split incoming individuals into (at most) a fixed number of batches and can only observe outcomes for the individuals within a batch at the batch's end.

By Yanjun Han, Zhengqing Zhou, Zihao Hu, Jose Blanchet, Peter W. Glynn, Yinyu Ye, Zhengyuan Zhou