← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Daniil Plyusov, Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Malakhov, Daria Korotyshova, Daniil Gavrilov

F-GRPO: Don't Let Your Policy Learn the Obvious and Forget the Rare

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces F-GRPO, a method that addresses the issue of reinforcement learning policies overfitting to common trajectories while neglecting rare correct ones. By deriving the probability of prompt‑local tail‑miss events and proposing a difficulty‑aware scaling coefficient inspired by Focal loss, the authors show that down‑weighting high‑success sampled groups can improve performance. Experiments on categorical simulations, Maze, and large language models (Qwen2.5‑7B) demonstrate that F‑GRPO raises average math pass rates and out‑of‑distribution performance without increasing group size or computational cost.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 30

LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO): A Sampling-Time Low-Rank Scaffold for Recovering Reinforcement-Learning Gradient on Zero-Reward Cliff Prompts

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot: on "cliff" prompts-those on which every sampled rollout in a group fails-the group-normalized advantage is identically zero, so GRPO produces no gradient on precisely the prompts at the frontier of the model's capability. We introduce LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO), a sampling-time mechanism that recovers this lost gradient.

reinforcement-learningfine-tuningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31

LoRA Scaffolded Policy Optimization (LSPO): A Sampling-Time Low-Rank Scaffold for Recovering Reinforcement-Learning Gradient on Zero-Reward Cliff Prompts

arXiv:2607. 27787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) for mathematical reasoning suffers from a structural blind spot: on "cliff" prompts-those on which every sampled rollout in a group fails-the group-normalized advantage is identically zero, so GRPO produces no gradient on precisely the prompts at the frontier of the model's capability.

By Ken Ding
reinforcement-learningfine-tuningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization

Group Adaptive Clipping Policy Optimization (GAPO) is a plug‑in modification to GRPO methods that adapts the importance‑sampling clipping boundary based on rollout advantage. By allowing rollouts with larger learning signals to receive proportionally greater update headroom, GAPO addresses the limitation of fixed clipping that suppresses rare but informative rollouts. Experiments on Qwen and Llama models show that GAPO consistently improves Pass@1 and Pass@k on math reasoning and coding benchmarks where base model pass rates are low.

By Sheng Jia, Xiao Wang, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Rein Houthooft
llmsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Spurious Advantage Hidden in GRPO

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) assigns a magnitude to each rollout based on within‑group reward statistics, rewarding rollouts that reach the correct answer through reasoning. However, the same magnitude can be high for rollouts that reach the answer by guessing, creating a spurious advantage that misleads the policy toward guess‑like behaviors. The paper identifies three scenarios where this occurs—bounded‑answer tasks, open‑answer sets with bounded sub‑cases, and search agents with many paths to the same answer—and proposes SIGNBALANCE, a composition‑free magnitude that preserves the verifier sign, uses a global scale, and restores zero‑mean balance via stop‑gradient per‑class rescaling, matching GRPO on open‑answer math and improving on bounded‑answer math and search agents.

By Jiamian Wang, Samyadeep Basu, Koustava Goswami, Tong Yu, Zhiqiang Tao
agentsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Early Verdicts, Better Budgets: Sequential Adaptive Rollout Allocation for Compute-Efficient RLVR

arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.

By Pixel Nomand, Elena Voss, Marcus Hale, Sofia Reyes
reinforcement-learning
More like this →