Hugging Face Trending Papers

Exploring the Potential of Symbolic Regression in Precision Livestock Farming

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The study explores explainable AI for precision livestock farming by using acceleration sensor data to predict farrowing time in sows. It first detects nest‑building behavior in 166 of 180 sows and then predicts the remaining time to farrowing using symbolic regression, achieving a mean absolute error of 9.28 hours. Compared with closed‑box models such as support vector regression and neural networks, symbolic regression outperformed them in both accuracy and interpretability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 31

Exploring the Potential of Symbolic Regression in Precision Livestock Farming

The study explores explainable AI for precision livestock farming by using acceleration sensor data to predict farrowing time in sows. It first detects nest‑building behavior in 166 of 180 sows, then applies symbolic regression to forecast the remaining time to farrowing, achieving a mean absolute error of 9.28 hours. Symbolic regression outperformed traditional closed‑box models such as support vector regression and neural networks in both accuracy and interpretability.

By Elisabeth Mayrhuber, Maciej Oczak, Michael Iwersen, David Brunner, Viktoria Dorfer, Stephan Winkler
arXiv AI
Oct 28

Crop Yield Prediction Using Regression Models: A Comparative Evaluation of Model Performance

The study compares five regression models—multiple linear regression, random‑forest regression, decision‑tree regression, ridge regression, and lasso regression—for predicting crop yield using a dataset of 1,000,000 observations and ten variables. After preprocessing, the models were evaluated with 80:20 and 70:30 training‑testing splits, using R‑squared, MSE, and RMSE as metrics. Lasso regression and multiple linear regression achieved the highest test R‑squared (~0.913) and lowest RMSE (~0.501), with linear models providing competitive baselines and random forest showing a large training‑testing gap.

By Saptak Das, Arijit Sarkar, Soumik Neogi, Suborno Naskar
arXiv AI
Sep 23

Agentic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (Agentic XAI) Approach To Explore Better Explanation: A Case Study in Decision Support for Rice Cultivation in Japan

arXiv:2512. 21066v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) reveals how explanatory variables relate to a response variable, yet communicating XAI outputs to laypersons remains difficult, limiting trust in AI-based predictions.

By Tomoaki Yamaguchi, Yutong Zhou, Masahiro Ryo, Keisuke Katsura