arXiv:2607. 08573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal emotion and sentiment recognition is commonly addressed by early fusion, which concatenates modalities before classification, or late fusion, which combines independently trained unimodal predictors.
By Adis Alihodzic, Selma Skopljakovic Hubljar
The paper introduces a multimodal emotion recognition system that integrates facial expressions, speech, text, and body movement to aid clinicians in psychological evaluation. While individual modalities perform well on benchmarks, their real‑world accuracy drops to 82.97%–87.64%, whereas the fused multimodal system reaches 96.43% accuracy with no state below 92.31%. These findings demonstrate that multimodal fusion enhances robustness in realistic settings, supporting more reliable evaluator assistance.
By Kris Kraack
Conventional face recognition relies on static appearance cues and degrades in unconstrained settings with expression variation, occlusion, and poor lighting. We hypothesize that audiovisual expression dynamics carry identity-discriminative information complementary to static appearance, and that extracting this signal requires multimodal representations robust to the variable input quality of in-the-wild video.
arXiv:2608. 07867v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict.
By Bojing Hou, Ruohao Li, Yitong Zhu, Luwen Yu, Yuyang Wang
arXiv:2606. 02679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal systems often benefit from combining information across language, sound, and visual streams, but this benefit is not guaranteed.
By Jiyuan Liu, Liangwei Nathan Zheng, Wei Emma Zhang, Xinpei Wang, Weitong Chen
The paper introduces the Modality Discrepancy Transformer (MDT), a model designed to detect ambivalence and hesitancy in clinical videos by capturing cross‑modal disagreement across facial, vocal, and linguistic signals. MDT expands a 6‑token representation to 9 tokens that include modality embeddings, absolute‑difference features, and Hadamard‑product discrepancy features, which are processed through Transformer self‑attention with FiLM‑based text conditioning and LoRA fine‑tuning. On the BAH dataset from the 3rd ABAW Challenge, MDT achieves a Macro F1 score of 0.7408 on the labelled test split and 0.7368 on the private leaderboard, surpassing the strongest baseline by over 10 points while training in under 20 minutes on a single GPU.
By Shiyu Luo, Yu Wang, Jiawen Huang, Zhaoxiang Xiao, Chenxi Huang, Qi Zhang, Bin Liu