arXiv Machine Learning By Kyrylo Yemets, Andrii Yaroshevych, Victor Muryn, Ostap Khomenko, Pavlo Kryven, Maksym Kmet, Maksym Shamrai, Mariya Hirna

Evaluating the Applicability of LLM Inference Optimizations on Apple Silicon

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates how well common large‑language‑model (LLM) inference optimizations perform on Apple Silicon compared to server‑class NVIDIA GPUs. Four optimization families—KV‑cache pruning, speculative decoding, ported GPU kernels, and post‑training quantization—are evaluated on four Apple machines under a single‑request decode workload, with matched RTX 4090 comparisons where possible. Results show that KV‑cache pruning can boost Apple throughput up to 1.75×, while speculative decoding actually reduces throughput on Apple; CUDA kernel designs transfer only partially, and quantization gains vary by machine, indicating that speedups depend on the specific technique, runtime, hardware, and workload regime.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 28

Energy Efficiency of Locally Deployed LLMs: A Preliminary Quantitative GPU Power Benchmark on Consumer Hardware

The paper reports a reproducible GPU power benchmark for 18 open‑source LLMs (0.5B–7B parameters) run on a single consumer RTX 4060ti GPU using the Ollama inference engine. Energy metrics such as mean/peak power, total energy per prompt, energy per output token, and throughput were measured, revealing that model architecture and quantization strategy, rather than parameter count alone, drive energy efficiency. The most efficient models were qwen2.5:0.5b and tinyllama:1.1b, while the 7B‑Mistral model consumed up to 8.6× more energy per token, and qwen3.5:0.8b(on) showed unusually high per‑prompt energy due to extended internal reasoning.

By Philipp M. Z\"ahl, Elja Dalipaj, Anika Hennig, Timon Bayer