arXiv Computation and Language
Evaluating Perspectival Biases in Cross-Modal Retrieval
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Multimodal Representation Alignment for Cross-modal Information Retrieval
arXiv:2506. 08774v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Different machine learning models can represent the same underlying concept in different ways.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
MELLA: Bridging Linguistic Capability and Cultural Groundedness for Low-Resource Language MLLMs
arXiv:2508. 05502v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) perform strongly in high-resource languages, yet often produce fluent but culturally "thin" descriptions in low-resource settings.
arXiv AI
Jul 20
Debiasing Text-to-Image Evaluation via Implicit Cultural Alignment Reward Modeling
arXiv:2607. 15740v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Text-to-Image (T2I) systems rapidly advance, evaluating the cultural authenticity of synthesized content has become increasingly important for fair and trustworthy generative AI.
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28
Many Dialects, Many Languages, One Cultural Lens: Evaluating Multilingual VLMs for Bengali Culture Understanding Across Historically Linked Languages and Regional Dialects
BanglaVerse is a new benchmark that evaluates multilingual vision‑language models on Bengali culture, covering nine visual domains and expanding to four languages and five Bangla dialects for a total of about 32,200 artifacts. It includes visual question answering and captioning tasks built from 1,152 manually curated images. Experiments show that models perform worse on dialectal variants and that missing cultural knowledge, rather than visual grounding, is the main bottleneck.
arXiv AI
Aug 28
MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives
MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives proposes a two‑stage framework that first aligns a student model to a stable English semantic space using knowledge distillation, then jointly optimizes distillation and cross‑lingual contrastive learning to improve retrieval discrimination while preserving alignment. The approach addresses language clustering and the trade‑off between cross‑lingual alignment and embedding uniformity, outperforming existing cross‑lingual training baselines on both multilingual and multi‑monolingual benchmarks. MIMO also remains competitive with larger off‑the‑shelf models and its alignment‑uniformity analysis clarifies the distinct roles of the two loss components. whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates a practical method to enhance multilingual information retrieval performance by balancing alignment and uniformity, which is crucial for real‑world search environments where queries and documents span multiple languages."
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Can Frontier LLMs Match Natively Multimodal Embeddings? A Comparison on Hard-Negative Text-to-Image Retrieval
arXiv:2608. 11343v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal retrieval and classification across different types of media, spanning text, images,video and audio, has traditionally relied on dual-encoder models that align visual and textual representations through contrastive learning.