arXiv:2608. 20218v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electronic Navigational Charts (ENCs) are geospatial vector datasets used in maritime navigation systems that represent hydrographic and navigational information such as depths, navigational aids, traffic schemes, and hazards.
By Jacob Arndt, Abhishek Potnis, Alexandre Sorokine
arXiv:2606. 29773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graphs are widely used to model relational systems, with applications in domains such as social networks, finance, and biomedicine.
By Haoxin Sun, Yiqing Lin, Yajun Huang, Chenhui Dong, Mingjun Li, Zhongzhi Zhang
arXiv:2606. 19956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Map generalization remains one of the fundamental tasks in cartography, especially for the simplification and aggregation of complex building footprints.
By Yanning Wang, Zhiyong Zhou, Zhouyu Liu, Mengni Yu, Yu Feng
The paper presents a comparative analysis of six state‑of‑the‑art counterfactual explainers for graph neural networks, focusing on methods that can both add and remove edges to alter model predictions. It evaluates these explainers across diverse real‑world and synthetic datasets, covering binary and multi‑class graph and node classification tasks, using a range of quantitative and qualitative metrics. The study highlights the trade‑offs between explanation size, coverage, and quality, aiming to pinpoint each method’s strengths and weaknesses to inform future research.
By Maria Myrto Villia, Filippos Gouidis, Theodore Patkos, Panos Trahanias
arXiv:2507. 21873v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) excel at predictive tasks on graph-structured data but often lack the ability to incorporate symbolic domain knowledge and perform general reasoning.
By Raffaele Pojer, Andrea Passerini, Kim G. Larsen, Manfred Jaeger
SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.
By Shubhajit Roy, Anirban Dasgupta