The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Speech Large Language Models (Speech-LLMs), typically built from a pre-trained speech encoder, a modality projector, and an LLM fine-tuned with Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA), have shown strong Automatic Sp...
arXiv:2604.06487v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conventional end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely on paired speech-text data for domain adaptation. Recent LLM-based ASR arch...
arXiv:2509.10452v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pretrained automatic speech recognition (ASR) models such as Whisper perform well but still need domain adaptation to handle unseen parlance....
arXiv:2609.15743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems, trained on paired speech-text data, have been improved by leveraging language models (LMs) trained on text-...
The paper revisits large‑language‑model (LLM) based automatic speech recognition (ASR) from an entropy‑allocation perspective, introducing three metrics to analyze how entropy reduction is distributed between the speech encoder and the LLM. It proposes a multi‑stage training strategy that addresses entropy‑allocation inefficiencies, including a redesigned pretraining phase to reduce the speech‑text modality gap and an iterative asynchronous fine‑tuning stage to maintain functional decoupling and limit encoder drift. Experiments on Mandarin and English benchmarks demonstrate competitive performance with state‑of‑the‑art models using only 2.3 B parameters, while also reducing hallucinations through the decoupling‑oriented design.
The paper introduces ABX-Accent, a benchmark built on the AESRC dataset that evaluates how well representation learning models adapt to 10 different English accents with less than 10 hours of unlabeled data per accent. It adapts the Zero Resources Challenge ABX metrics for each accent and demonstrates a baseline using adaptive domain normalization to fine‑tune a Contrastive Predictive Coding model, achieving a 23.6% relative improvement on across‑speaker ABX scores compared to non‑adapted models. The dataset and evaluation metrics will be released publicly after the paper is accepted.