arXiv Computation and Language By Petter T\"ornberg, Juliana Chueri

Elite political incivility is rising across democracies

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study analyzes 13.8 million tweets from parliamentarians in 26 democracies and finds that severe political incivility nearly doubled from about 2.7 % in 2017 to 5.8 % in 2022. Populist parties are the strongest predictor of incivility, especially when in opposition, while stronger liberal democracies are associated with lower levels of severe incivility. The increase is largely behavioral, with mainstream parties becoming more aggressive, leading to a narrowing gap between radical and mainstream parties’ uncivil rhetoric.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

High prevalence of antagonizing rhetoric in trending topics on Twitter/X

The study introduces a computational method to distinguish between antagonizing and criticizing rhetoric in political discourse on Twitter/X. Analyzing over 17 million tweets from German trending topics, it finds that roughly one‑third contain antagonizing rhetoric, which is more prevalent in trending discussions than in general Twitter traffic. Right‑leaning users use antagonizing language more than left‑leaning users, and both forms of rhetoric are amplified within political camps, with certain parties—AfD and the Greens—emerging as primary antagonists.

By Armin Pournaki, Eckehard Olbrich
arXiv AI
Jun 30

LLM-Ideoplasticity: Measuring Ideological Plasticity in the Political Behavior of LLMs as a Context-Conditioned Distribution

arXiv:2606. 28335v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We argue, with systematic empirical evidence, that a large language model's political ideology is not a fixed point, but a conditional distribution $\mathbb{P}($position$\mid$context$)$ over a real political space.

By Adib Sakhawat, Syed Rifat Raiyan, Tahsin Islam, Takia Farhin, Hasan Mahmud, Md Kamrul Hasan
arXiv AI
2d ago

Validating LLM-generated political networks with survey-reported partisan exposure

The study evaluates large language models (LLMs) that generate political networks by comparing them to survey-reported partisan exposure from the ANES 2020–2022 Social Media Study. It finds that while network structure and political assortativity vary across model configurations, many models either over‑separate Democratic and Republican egos or underestimate Republican exposure, leading to group‑specific errors in local partisan environments. These discrepancies persist even among networks with similar aggregate properties, indicating that aggregate metrics alone can mask important individual‑level inaccuracies.

By Marco Tonin, Michele Tizzoni, Bruno Lepri, Luca Maria Aiello