arXiv:2606. 29532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Integrating unstructured data into relational database systems is increasingly important as demand grows for natural language querying and analysis.
By Christopher Gou, Aditya Banerjee, Jiaxuan Wang, Chunwei Liu
arXiv:2607. 20926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources.
By Yinhao Tang, Youqing Fang, Yanan Sun, Wenran Liu, Weiming Zhang, Bin Liu, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen
arXiv:2606. 13871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular data embeddings have become a cornerstone of data profiling and data integration pipelines, enabling tasks such as entity annotation and resolution; schema matching; column type detection; and table search, among others.
By Sebasti\'an Bugedo, Stijn Vansummeren
JoinGR is a join‑aware table retrieval method that treats a database’s join graph as the retrieval space. It represents columns as graph nodes and both intra‑table and foreign‑key relationships as typed edges, then selects anchor tables, traverses join edges with a query‑conditioned scorer, and aggregates edge deposits into table scores. Experiments on BIRD, Spider, and BEAVER show that JoinGR matches or surpasses strong retrieval baselines, especially improving recall on multi‑hop table requirements, and its learned scorer transfers across benchmarks, indicating reusable join‑graph traversal behavior.
By Sandipan De, Abhijit Chakraborty, Sambaran Bandyopadhyay, Vivek Gupta
The paper evaluates seven graph database engines, including Corvic AI, on a synthetic biomedical property graph with 1.02 million nodes and 5.34 million rows. It benchmarks query latency, bulk‑ingest throughput, point‑update latency, and correctness across a twenty‑query workload that covers neighborhood lookups, bounded paths, set intersections, anti‑joins, aggregation, ranking, temporal filters, full scans, and relational joins. The study finds that no single engine is universally fastest; performance depends on query shape, and the largest cost difference arises from bulk‑ingest throughput, which varies by three orders of magnitude and dominates total cost for workloads with fewer than about 10⁵ queries per data refresh.
By Donald Nguyen, Gurbinder Gill, Hadi Ahmadi, Christopher J. Rossbach
arXiv:2601.13111v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Realistic text-to-SQL workflows often require joining multiple tables. As a result, accurately retrieving the relevant set of tables becomes...
By Hassan Soliman, Vivek Gupta, Dan Roth, Iryna Gurevych