arXiv Computation and Language By Ruidong Ma, Jisheng Dang, Ronghao Lin, Bimei Wang, Jingwen Zhao, Wenjun Ma, Wei-Shi Zheng, Meng Wang, Qi Tian, Tat-Seng Chua

EEG-HealthLLM: Hierarchical Adaptation of Large Language Models for Unified Heterogeneous EEG Health Assessment

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

EEG-HealthLLM introduces a hierarchical adaptation framework that unifies heterogeneous EEG health assessments using large language models. Task‑specific EEG adapters preserve unique spatio‑temporal dynamics, while a shared LoRA module in the LLM backbone captures common high‑level assessment semantics. The new EEG‑HealthBench benchmark reorganizes five EEG datasets into five health‑assessment tasks, and experiments show EEG‑HealthLLM achieves the highest average balanced accuracy and macro‑F1, improving performance while reducing adapter size by 80%.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

OmniEEG-Bench: A Standardized Evaluation Benchmark for EEG Foundation Models

arXiv:2606. 00815v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) supports a variety of brain-computer interface (BCI) tasks ranging from brain-state monitoring to human-LLM interactions.

By Ziling Lu, Zongsheng Li, Xinke Shen, Kexin Lou, Yingyue Xin, Xiaoqi Chen, Shinan Wang, Xiang Chen, Jiahao Fan, Chenyu Huang, Xin Xu, Zhoujie Hou, Chen Wei, Quanying Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 28

OneEEG: A Unified Signal-Visual Multimodal Language Model with Task-Aware Mixture of Projectors for Multi-Task EEG Understanding

OneEEG is a unified signal‑visual multimodal language model designed for multi‑task EEG understanding. It jointly learns from numerical EEG data and visual EEG renderings, employing a task‑aware Mixture of Projectors to align diverse EEG features with a large language model’s embedding space. The authors introduce the OneEEG‑Instruct dataset for instruction tuning and the OneEEG‑Bench benchmark to evaluate performance, demonstrating that existing multimodal LLMs struggle with EEG inputs while OneEEG outperforms them across various tasks.

By Jiacheng Zhang, Xueyi Zhang, Xin Lu, Siqi Cai, Haizhou Li
arXiv AI
Aug 6

BrainBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Comprehensive EEG Understanding

arXiv:2608. 04156v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis extends beyond assigning predefined labels to recordings; it requires workflows connecting natural-language instructions, signal processing, quantitative evidence, and scientific interpretation.

By Yangxuan Zhou, Sha Zhao, Yuning Chen, Chen Wu, Jiquan Wang, Shijian Li, Gang Pan
arXiv AI
Oct 1

NeuroAtlas: Benchmarking Foundation Models for Clinical EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

NeuroAtlas is the largest EEG benchmark to date, comprising 42 datasets and 260,000 hours of clinical EEG data across epilepsy, sleep medicine, brain age estimation, and brain‑computer interfaces. The study evaluates foundation models (FMs) for EEG against supervised baselines and generic time‑series FMs, finding that EEG‑specific FMs do not consistently outperform generic ones. It also demonstrates that standard machine‑learning metrics are inadequate for clinical relevance, advocating for task‑specific measures such as event‑level decision quality, hypnogram features, and brain‑age gap.

By Konstantinos Kontras, Trui Osselaer, Stylianos G. Mouslech, Angeliki-Ilektra Karaiskou, Guido Gagliardi, Thomas Strypsteen, Mohammad Hossein Badiei, Anku Rani, Maarten Vanmarcke, Miguel Bhagubai, Chanakya Ekbote, Jaedong Hwang, Christos Chatzichristos, Paul Pu Liang, Maarten De Vos
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Brain4FMs: A Benchmark of Foundation Models for Electrical Brain Signal

Brain4FMs is a unified benchmark for evaluating brain foundation models (BFMs) on both scalp EEG and intracranial EEG (iEEG). It incorporates 17 representative models and 21 public datasets spanning clinical diagnosis, sleep staging, communication, and affective computing, and offers dataset-aware preprocessing, cross‑subject evaluation, and standardized downstream workflows. The benchmark highlights that no single BFM consistently outperforms others across all tasks, modalities, and adaptation protocols, prompting further exploratory analyses of model‑specific spatial, spectral, and discrete representations.

By Fanqi Shen, Enhong Yang, Jiahe Li, Junru Hong, Xiaoran Pan, Zhizhang Yuan, Meng Li, Yang Yang