arXiv:2606. 06036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite recent progress, LLM agents still struggle with reasoning over long interaction histories.
By Shuo Ji, Yibo Li, Bryan Hooi
Large language model (LLM) agents often perform poorly on complex, long-horizon tasks because their context becomes increasingly cluttered over time. As interactions accumulate, detailed execution tra...
arXiv:2606. 11680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents struggle with long-horizon tasks due to their inherent statelessness, requiring all task-relevant information to be encoded in growing input contexts.
By Hao-Lun Hsu, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Boyi Liu, Zhewei Yao, Yuxiong He
The paper introduces AMA, a framework that uses multiple agents—Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher—to manage memory for large language model agents. AMA’s hierarchical memory design dynamically adjusts retrieval granularity to match task complexity, while the Judge and Refresher ensure relevance, consistency, and timely updates. Experiments on long-context benchmarks show AMA outperforms existing baselines and cuts token usage by about 80% compared to full-context approaches.
By Weiquan Huang, Zixuan Wang, Hehai Lin, Sudong Wang, Bo Xu, Qian Li, Beier Zhu, Linyi Yang, Chengwei Qin
arXiv:2608. 15703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents often perform poorly on complex, long-horizon tasks because their context becomes increasingly cluttered over time.
By XinQi Wang, Jinwei Xiao, Sijia Cui, Hongming Zhang, Yanna Wang, Qingyang Zhang, Bo Xu
arXiv:2606. 00610v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become an essential method for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging external knowledge.
By Chuanjie Wu, Zhishang Xiang, Yunbo Tang, Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su