arXiv:2608. 12351v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has challenged the validity of unsupervised online assessment, especially in technical subjects where plausible answers can be produced with little effort.
By Riasat Islam (School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom), Thomas Roelleke (School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom)
arXiv:2608. 07475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) presents a governance challenge for STEM assessment.
By Yizhu Gao, Zhongzhou Chen, Min Li, Xiaoming Zhai
arXiv:2606. 30655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-native course assessments in senior computer science courses and related fields should grade students by \emph{AI-resilient skill}: the ability to achieve outcomes beyond a strong AI baseline.
By Anshumali Shrivastava
arXiv:2607. 01255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Universities have responded to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in noticeably different ways, both internationally and within Spain.
By Jessica D\'iaz, Sonia Linio, Fernando Pescador, Daniel Martin-Fabiani
arXiv:2606. 07544v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Middle school is a key window for building core academic skills and the learning routines students carry into later grades, yet many students still fall behind because help is often limited and comes too late, after they have already been stuck for a while.
By Misan Paul Etchie, Taiwo Olutosin
arXiv:2509. 15035v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study investigates the use of generative AI to support formative assessment through machine generated reviews of peer reviews in graduate online courses in a public university in the United States.
By Gabriela C. Zapata, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, Duane Searsmith