arXiv:2608. 15559v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Anomaly detection in dynamic graphs underpins financial fraud analysis, intrusion detection, and platform integrity, where automated decisions require human-interpretable justifications.
By Iyad Assaad Nekka, Hamida Seba, Walid Khaled Hidouci, Karima Amrouche
arXiv:2608. 15965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Progress in streaming, edge-level graph anomaly detection (GAD) has been marked by increasingly elaborate architectures, from count-min-sketch chi square tests to memory-augmented attention networks.
By Omair Shafi Ahmed, Zohair Shafi
arXiv:2604. 17616v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Root cause analysis (RCA) for time-series anomaly detection is critical for the reliable operation of complex real-world systems.
By Shashank Mishra, Karan Patil, Cedric Schockaert, Didier Stricker, Jason Rambach
SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.
By Shubhajit Roy, Anirban Dasgupta
arXiv:2608. 19858v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalizable dynamic graph anomaly detection (DGAD) enables pretrained detectors to identify anomalies in unseen target domains without costly retraining.
By Jialun Zheng, Hanchen Yang, Jiannong Cao, Yankai Chen, Yuanjing Feng, Philip S. Yu
TH-GNN is a heterogeneous temporal graph neural network designed to detect shilling attacks generated by large language model (LLM) agents. It combines a two‑layer Heterogeneous Graph Transformer with per‑type and per‑relation attention, learnable sinusoidal temporal encodings, cross‑modal attention that fuses user embeddings with frozen RoBERTa representations of reviews and item descriptions, and a GRU that models log inter‑arrival times. Across five attack families and four benchmark datasets, TH‑GNN achieves a grand‑mean F1 score of 0.870, surpassing the best text‑only baseline on Agent4SR attacks by 10.9 percentage points and 11.5 percentage points at the lowest injection rate.
By Shivam Swarup, Divya Prakash Shrivastava, Rakesh Thakur