arXiv:2608. 04444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often generate inaccurate answers due to their reliance on static internal knowledge.
By Jiaoyang Li, Junhao Ruan, Shengwei Tang, Kaiyan Chang, Zhengtao Yu, Tong Xiao, Jingbo Zhu
arXiv:2608. 07838v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have increasingly supported response generation grounded in user-provided knowledge spanning heterogeneous structures.
By Shibo Chu, Yuze Liu, Tiehua Zhang, Zhishu Shen, Lianghua He, Haofen Wang, Zhijun Ding
arXiv:2607. 10562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the multi-hop reasoning capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge.
By JungMin Yun, JuneHyoung Kwon, YoungBin Kim
arXiv:2604. 01993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-hop QA benchmarks often reward Large Language Models (LLMs) for spurious correctness, where models reach correct answers through invalid intermediate reasoning.
By Daeyong Kwon, Soyoung Yoon, Seung-won Hwang
arXiv:2607. 23019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enables large language models (LLMs) to tackle multi-step reasoning tasks, yet the generated intermediate steps are not guaranteed to be logically sound.
By Zirong Chen, Meiyi Ma
arXiv:2607. 00341v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models achieve strong performance on many reasoning tasks when allowed to externalize intermediate steps as Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
By Hengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Zixuan Wang, Hanlin Zhu, Jason D. Lee, Jiantao Jiao, Stuart Russell, Song Mei