arXiv:2505. 22703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many problems in trustworthy ML can be expressed as constraints on prediction rates across subpopulations, including group fairness constraints (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.
By Mohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart, Aur\'elien Bellet, Nicolas Papernot
arXiv:2607. 05866v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Under a fixed privacy budget, the utility of differentially private (DP) training is ultimately determined by its optimization efficiency.
By Pan Li, Kai Chen, Shuai Chang, Shengzhi Zhang, Peizhuo Lv, Jinwen He
arXiv:2510. 05416v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) offers the promise of training deep learning models while mitigating many privacy risks.
By Xin Gu, Yingtai Xiao, Guanlin He, Jiamu Bai, Daniel Kifer, Kiwan Maeng
arXiv:2407. 08233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current differentially private learning paradigms face a severe utility bottleneck: DP-SGD degrades performance through noise accumulation over training steps, while aggregation-based approaches such as PATE suffer from data inefficiency due to disjoint data partitioning.
By Ding Chen, Haochen Luo, Xiaofei Wang, Chen Liu
arXiv:2607. 19580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differentially private machine learning enables model training on sensitive data while ensuring that individual data is unlikely to be recoverable from the parameters of the resulting model.
By Huaiyuan Rao, Calvin Hawkins, Alexander Benvenuti, Matthew Hale
arXiv:2605. 05905v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Objective perturbation is a standard mechanism in differentially private empirical risk minimization.
By Daniel Cortild, Coralia Cartis