arXiv AI By Weicai Huang (Beijing MQPat Technologies, Co., Ltd.)

DODR: Deterministic Operator-Driven Reasoning in Latent Space

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces DODR, a deterministic operator‑driven reasoning architecture that models reasoning as graph computations in a high‑dimensional linear‑algebraic space, replacing token‑level sampling with matrix operations. Reasoning states are snapshot vectors of semantic units, and three trainable matrix operators—deduction, induction, and abduction—implement Peirce’s inference types. Experiments on 503 records demonstrate near‑perfect deduction, high generalization for induction, and significant gains for abduction, while the design guarantees zero hallucination and supports continual learning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 2

Latent Recurrent Thoughts: Recurrent Refinement of Proposed Latents for Reasoning with Frozen LLMs

Latent Recurrent Thoughts (LRT) proposes a method for reasoning with frozen large language models by operating in the model’s continuous representation space. A small auxiliary network generates initial latent vectors, which a tiny recurrent reasoner refines over multiple steps, decoupling computational depth from model size. Experiments on symbolic and natural‑language reasoning tasks show that LRT outperforms prior frozen‑decoder continuous‑space methods and chain‑of‑thought prompting while using far less inference compute.

By Zhaoliang Chen, Jie Fu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows

arXiv:2606. 06447v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models often improve reasoning by generating explicit chain-of-thought (CoT), demonstrating the importance of intermediate computation.

By Guancheng Tu, Xiangjun Fu, Suhao Yu, Yao Tang, Haoqiang Kang, Lianhui Qin, Yizhe Zhang, Jiatao Gu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Do Language Models Follow Occam's Razor? An Evaluation of Parsimony in Inductive and Abductive Reasoning

The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) follow Occam's Razor when performing inductive and abductive reasoning. It introduces a synthetic framework for generating questions that require both types of reasoning and a new automated metric to evaluate the simplicity and correctness of generated hypotheses. Experiments show that while LLMs can handle simple scenarios, they struggle with complex world models and producing high‑quality, simplest hypotheses, even when using advanced reasoning techniques.

By Yunxin Sun, Abulhair Saparov