arXiv AI By Xinyue Liang, Yizhe Yang, Yu Bai, Bin Xu, Jiawei Li, Yang Gao

Diverse Thinking Schemata Elicit Better Reasoning in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 08974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) have attracted increasing attention for their ability to solve complex mathematical problems by generating extended reasoning chains.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 17

Know Thy Reasoner: Not All Language Models Explore Alike

arXiv:2604. 10827v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Compute scaling for LLM reasoning trades off exploring solution approaches (\emph{breadth}) against refining promising ones (\emph{depth}), yet why a given trade-off works, and why it often fails to transfer across models, remains unclear.

By Moulik Choraria, Argyrios Gerogiannis, Anirban Das, Supriyo Chakraborty, Sourya Basu, Sambit Sahu, Lav R. Varshney
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

Schema-Anchored Latent Reasoning for Semantic Parsing-Based Knowledge Base Question Answering

The paper introduces SALR, a schema‑anchored latent reasoning approach for generating logical forms in knowledge‑base question answering. SALR delays explicit schema commitments by generating continuous thoughts in hidden states and aligns these thoughts with a codebook of KB schema elements, guided by an alignment objective derived from gold logical forms. Experiments on GrailQA and WebQSP demonstrate that SALR consistently outperforms strong baselines, notably improving compositional question performance by 2.86 F1 points over TIARA.

By Guangze Gao, Zixuan Li, Sikui Zhang, Chunfeng Yuan, Wenjuan Li, Bing Li, Xiaolong Jin, Weiming Hu