arXiv:2606. 03210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic-differentiation-based inverse analysis methods, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and differentiable programming, have recently shown great promise due to their ability to compute accurate gradients and convergence efficiency.
By Yongjin Choi, Hyeonbin Moon, Seunghwa Ryu
arXiv:2606. 05199v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The identification of constitutive neural network models from heterogeneous full-field deformation data provides a robust alternative to traditional calibration methods based on homogeneous stress-strain experiments, particularly given the high dimensionality of trainable parameters.
By Matthias Knipper, Chenyi Ji, Malte Brand, Kevin Linka
The paper presents an adaptive physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for solving the Blasius boundary‑layer equation. By combining gradient‑norm‑based loss weighting, nonuniform residual‑based collocation, and a sequential Adam–L‑BFGS optimization, the authors achieve a highly accurate prediction of the wall‑shear coefficient, with an absolute error of $1.896 imes10^{-5}$ for $f''(0)$. A comparative study of network architectures shows that a two‑hidden‑layer model yields the lowest wall‑shear error, while deeper networks reduce the weighted loss but increase physical error.
"whyItMatters":"The adaptive framework demonstrates that coordinated adjustments to loss weighting, collocation strategy, and optimization can substantially improve the physical accuracy of PINNs for classical fluid dynamics problems."
By Mehari Fentahun Endalew, Xiaoming John Zhang
The paper introduces ADE‑FEMU, an end‑to‑end differentiable framework that embeds a constitutive neural network within a JAX‑based finite element solver and learns its parameters by minimizing a measurement‑mismatch loss using automatic differentiation. It demonstrates two neural network architectures—a flexible grey‑box CANN and an interpretable white‑box CANN—for incompressible isotropic hyperelastic materials, and validates the approach on three experimental datasets, including full‑field DIC, reduced‑data stretch profiles, and a heterogeneous matrix‑inclusion system.
By Matthias Knipper, Chenyi Ji, Malte Brand, Kevin Linka
The paper introduces a linearized Physics-Informed Neural Network (lPINN), a reduced‑order neural basis approach for solving forward and inverse differential equations. In an offline phase, lPINN learns continuous, differentiable neural basis functions from numerical solutions, which are then frozen for new problem instances; the online solution is obtained by minimizing the governing‑equation residual with additional constraints. Experiments on advection‑diffusion, Burgers', and nonlinear pendulum equations show that lPINN achieves lower solution and parameter errors than vanilla PINNs while reducing online inference times by up to three orders of magnitude, and its continuous representation generalizes to finer meshes without retraining.
By Wenhao Chen, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partia...
By Muhammad Luthfi Shahab, Imam Mukhlash, Hadi Susanto