Weight-space geometry plays a central role in neural network optimization, yet manifold constraints are often applied uniformly across all weight matrices. In this work, we ask whether different transformer modules prefer different manifold geometries.
arXiv:2606. 27449v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-head attention conventionally partitions the hidden dimension equally across all heads at every layer, enforcing an identical representational subspace dimension (dh = dmodel/h) throughout the models depth.
By Shubham Aggarwal
arXiv:2602. 18948v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transformer models contain substantial internal redundancy arising from coordinate-dependent representations and continuous symmetries, in model space and in head space, respectively.
By J. Fran\c{c}ois, L. Ravera
arXiv:2608. 02064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feed-forward networks (FFNs) account for a large fraction of Transformer parameters, yet their hidden width is usually constant across depth.
By Timur Mudarisov, Mikhail Burtsev, Radu State
arXiv:2607. 18130v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most parameter-efficient finetuning (PEFT) methods adapt weights or activations, thus leaving one of the key Transformer components unchanged: residual connections.
By Valentijn Oldenburg, Floris de Kam, Bente Zuijdam, Lieve Eberson, Nicky van Zutphen, Stef de Wildt, Ivo Verhoeven
arXiv:2608. 01283v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: All Transformer-based large language models compute attention via the Euclidean inner product, an architectural choice that Dong et al.
By Sen Song