Hugging Face Trending Papers

Dependency Graphs of Mathematical Arguments: Representation, Structural Measurement, and Proof Review

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

The paper introduces a source‑grounded framework that represents mathematical arguments as directed acyclic graphs, incorporating numbered and unnumbered statements, equations, assumptions, and constructions while distinguishing source occurrences from contextual states and inference records. It defines measurement metrics such as depth (longest prerequisite path) and bulk (distinct ancestor edges), and provides a standardized, versioned prompt protocol for annotation discovery, deterministic recomputation, and review assistance. The framework also supports cross‑paper links to explore theorem co‑use, rare combinations, and dependency communities, aiming to motivate probabilistic premise suggestions and review of omissions or unchecked conditions in both human‑written and AI‑generated proofs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Oct 28

Dependency Graphs of Mathematical Arguments: Representation, Structural Measurement, and Proof Review

The paper introduces a framework that uses large language models to represent and measure mathematical arguments, capturing statements, equations, assumptions, and constructions while distinguishing source occurrences from contextual states and inference records. It defines a directed acyclic graph representation where depth is the longest prerequisite path and bulk counts distinct ancestor edges, providing a recurrence that handles shared subarguments and preserves macro skeletons. The framework includes a standardized, versioned prompt protocol for annotation discovery, deterministic recomputation, and review assistance, and proposes cross‑paper links to study theorem co‑use and support probabilistic premise suggestions and review of omissions.

By Eunji Park
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

arXiv:2606. 08728v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mathematical reasoning has long served as a stringent test of machine intelligence; over the past decade, it has moved from a niche problem within NLP to one of the most consequential AI frontiers.

By Syed Rifat Raiyan, Mohsinul Kabir, Hasan Mahmud, Md Kamrul Hasan
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

Lean Graph Search for Formal Theorem Proving

LeanGraphSearch is a graph‑based retrieval method for the Lean 4 theorem prover that builds a dependency graph from Mathlib’s forward dependencies and traverses it to find supporting lemmas via multi‑hop chains. By linking each declaration to its premises, propagating relevance through a graph‑ranking algorithm, and re‑ranking candidates against the original query, it improves recall by up to 12% over LeanSearch v2 on MathlibQR and increases coverage of complete annotated proof routes on MathlibMPR by up to 3.7%. When integrated into an iterative proving loop, LeanGraphSearch raises pass rates at 8, 16, and 32 reflection turns by as much as 40% compared to a vanilla prover and up to 10% compared to LeanSearch v2, demonstrating higher accuracy‑cost efficiency.

By Yihan Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Junyi Zhang, Di Wu, Haikang Deng, Po-Nien Kung, Kai-Wei Chang, Amit Sahai, Wei Wang, Nanyun Peng
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Automated Conjecture Resolution with Formal Verification

arXiv:2604. 03789v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models have significantly improved their ability to perform mathematical reasoning, extending from elementary problem solving to increasingly capable performance on research-level problems.

By Haocheng Ju, Guoxiong Gao, Jiedong Jiang, Bin Wu, Zeming Sun, Shurui Liu, Leheng Chen, Yutong Wang, Yuefeng Wang, Zichen Wang, Wanyi He, Peihao Wu, Liang Xiao, Ruochuan Liu, Bryan Dai, Bin Dong