arXiv Computer Vision By Kango Yanagida, Tatsuya Aoki, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Takato Horii

DeicticVLA: Unifying Instruction Modes Based on Language and Deictic Gestures in a Single VLA

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

DeicticVLA unifies three instruction modes—Language Instruction, Vision‑Language Instruction, and Visual Instruction—into a single text prompt and deictic mask framework, allowing a single pretrained Vision‑Language‑Action model to handle all modes. The approach uses text‑prompt completion and deictic gesture grounding, and evaluates various visual prompting methods and training strategies in simulation and real‑world tasks. Results show that two‑stage training improves deictic mask usage, and that Vision‑Language and Visual Instruction outperform Language Instruction on unseen expressions, appearance changes, and novel objects, achieving 100% success on unseen categories.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Prompting with Sign Parameters for Low-resource Sign Language Instruction Generation

The paper introduces BdSLIG, the first Bengali Sign Language Instruction Generation dataset, aimed at evaluating Vision Language Models on under-resourced SLIG tasks and long-tail visual concepts. It proposes Sign Parameter-Infused (SPI) prompting, which embeds standard sign parameters such as hand shape, motion, and orientation into textual prompts to improve zero-shot performance and produce more structured, reproducible instructions. The work seeks to promote inclusivity and advance sign language learning systems for under-resourced communities.

By Md Tariquzzaman, Md Farhan Ishmam, Saiyma Sittul Muna, Md Kamrul Hasan, Hasan Mahmud
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

Learning What to Say to Your VLA: Mostly Harmless Vision Language Action Model Steering

arXiv:2606. 12299v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a natural language interface to robot control, but the mapping from language to behavior is often brittle and unintuitive: semantically similar instructions can induce drastically different behaviors, while some capabilities may not be elicitable through prompting alone.

By Hyun Joe Jeong, Gokul Swamy, Andrea Bajcsy
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

Do VLAs Really Follow Instructions? Diagnosing How-Level Instruction Following in Vision-Language-Action Models

The paper investigates whether vision‑language‑action (VLA) models truly follow How‑level instructions that detail how to perform a task. The authors find that current VLAs do not benefit from such instructions and that task success actually decreases. They propose training with segment‑level enriched instructions and a new benchmark, SIMPLER‑IN, to better assess How‑level instruction following, but conclude that this remains an open challenge.

By Sangwu Park, Wonjoong Kim, Yeonjun In, Chanyoung Park
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

V-GIFT: Boosting Visual Instruction Tuning with Self-Supervised Guidance

The paper introduces V‑GIFT, a lightweight method that enhances visual instruction tuning for multimodal large language models by incorporating a small set of visually grounded self‑supervised tasks expressed as natural language instructions. These tasks—such as rotation prediction, color matching, and cross‑view correspondence—are reformulated into image‑instruction‑response triplets, providing supervision that cannot be solved without visual evidence. The approach requires no human annotations, architectural changes, or extra training stages, and consistently improves vision‑centric performance across various models, regimes, and benchmarks when only 3‑10% of the training data is augmented with these instructions.

By Sophia Sirko-Galouchenko, Monika Wysoczanska, Andrei Bursuc, Nicolas Thome, Spyros Gidaris