arXiv AI By Yoshinari Fujinuma, Varun Gangal, Traian Rebedea, Makesh Narasimhan Sreedhar, Prasoon Varshney, Rebecca Qian, Anand Kannappan

Defenses & Enablers For Skill Injection Attacks on Terminal Based Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 01567v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on reusable skills i.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

AgentLeak: Cloning Stronger LLM Agent Capabilities onto Weaker Agents Beyond Skill Stealing

The paper introduces AgentLeak, a black‑box attack that clones the task‑solving capabilities of a strong LLM agent onto a weaker one by exploiting differences between successful and failed executions. Unlike prior skill‑stealing methods that only recover explicit skill artifacts, AgentLeak identifies and incorporates missing procedural behaviors, boosting task pass rates by over 40% and closing more than 80% of the capability gap across 20 scenarios. The study demonstrates that observable execution behavior can leak proprietary procedural knowledge, posing a confidentiality risk for LLM agents.

By Xiaoting Lyu, Yuhong Wu, Yufei Han, Shichang Liu, Liang Zhang, Bin Wang, Bin Wang, Xiaobo Ma, Wei Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

SkillBloat: Token Amplification Attacks via Skill Injection in LLM Coding Agents

The paper "SkillBloat: Token Amplification Attacks via Skill Injection in LLM Coding Agents" investigates how agent skills—task‑specific instructions, scripts, and resources—can be exploited to create a trusted instruction channel that enables token amplification attacks. It introduces a two‑phase framework, SkillBloat, which first screens a library of attack‑type conditions across multiple amplification mechanisms and then refines the strongest candidate through LLM‑guided full‑document skill rewriting. Evaluated on a real‑world skill benchmark, SkillBloat achieves an average best amplification of 5.4184×–10.1455× across multiple coding‑agent target configurations, and an ablation study shows that the second‑stage refinement consistently improves performance over the initial screening alone.

By Yuanjin Zheng, Jingbang Chen