Hugging Face Trending Papers

Defending Against Harmful Supervision Hidden in Benign Samples

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Existing defenses are effective when harmful content is explicitly mixed into downstream fine-tuning data, but crafted samples can instead hide harmful supervision inside benign tasks. We propose Embedded Attack, where harmful QA pairs are embedded within benign training samples, and show that representative guardrails often fail to detect them at the example level.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

Safety-Aligned Weights Are Not Enough: Refusal-Teacher-Guided Finetuning Enhances Safety and Downstream Performance under Harmful Finetuning Attacks

arXiv:2506.07356v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Finetuning-as-a-Service (FaaS) enables customization of Large Language Models (LLMs) using user data, this service is vulnerable to safety de...

By Seokil Ham, Yubin Choi, Yujin Yang, Seungju Cho, Younghun Kim, Changick Kim
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Hidden Threat in Synthetic Data: Covert Targeted Bias Injection through Benign Text

The paper examines how synthetic data can be used to covertly inject targeted social biases into aligned large language models. By having a misaligned teacher model generate filtered synthetic datasets in domains like creative writing and code generation, the authors fine‑tune aligned student models and demonstrate that the benign‑looking data can transmit biases while preserving general task performance. The study highlights a security risk in synthetic data‑driven LLM training pipelines and proposes log‑linearity‑based scoring as a potential safeguard.

By Minkyung Cho, Jihyo Kim, SeungWoo Song, Junghun Yuk, Minjoon Kee, Hoyun Song, KyungTae Lim