DeepRewind: Predicting and Repairing Premature Commitments in Deep Research Agents
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2607. 20891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Research agents extend LLM-based assistants into long-horizon workflows involving planning, retrieval, evidence synthesis, and report generation, yet their reliability in open information environments remains underexplored.
arXiv:2609.01294v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep-research agents answer complex questions by interacting with search and browsing tools, yet they often search along a single evolving trajectory....
arXiv:2607. 21461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research requires agents to find answers that jointly satisfy multiple constraints.
arXiv:2605.26081v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep research agents face vast, interdependent, and pervasively uncertain information. Existing systems explore what evolving intermediate represen...
arXiv:2608. 04738v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous research agents can generate hypotheses, execute experiments, and draft manuscripts, yet their outputs often contain unsupported claims and inconsistencies between research questions, experiments, results, and conclusions.
LongCat-DeepResearch is a deep research system that merges an enhanced LongCat model with a multi‑agent workflow to produce comprehensive, evidence‑grounded reports. The workflow separates global planning from detailed investigation, using planning agents to create a ResearchSpec and research agents to draft sections in parallel, followed by targeted local revisions guided by global review. The system achieves strong benchmark scores, including 55.25 on DeepResearchBench and 79.83 on ResearchRubrics, and shows benefits from combining planning perspectives and additional editing for readability.