arXiv Machine Learning By Zhicong Huang, Cheng Hong, Tao Wei

DeepInvert: Semi-Supervised Embedding Inversion Against Obfuscated Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 04477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud-based language model services routinely process prompts containing sensitive information.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

Denoising-Aware Inversion: Revealing Privacy Risks in Noise-Protected Text Embeddings

The paper investigates the vulnerability of Gaussian‑noised text embeddings to inversion attacks. It identifies a "Double Noise Trap" that hampers standard generative methods and introduces DAEI, a denoising‑aware pipeline that significantly outperforms existing baselines in reconstructing original text. Experiments show DAEI improves BLEU by 154% and token‑level metrics by 32–60%.

By Yubo Wang, Shujie Cui, James Bailey, Hongzhi Yin, Wenyu Liang, Min Tang, Shiyue Qin, Weiqing Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Position Matters: Feature Inversion Attacks in ViT Split Inference with Token Reduction and Shuffling

The paper investigates privacy risks in Vision Transformer (ViT) split‑inference systems that use token reduction and token shuffling to lower computation and communication costs. It shows that even after token shuffling, transmitted token embeddings still contain enough positional information for a new attack, the Spatially Aligned Reconstruction Attack (SARA), which predicts token positions, restores spatial layout, fills missing embeddings with a masked autoencoder, and reconstructs the input image. While token reduction offers stronger protection, significant leakage remains when retained tokens preserve semantic and positional cues, and the authors propose a lightweight edge‑side defense that removes positional embeddings and adapts transformer blocks via knowledge distillation to reduce SARA’s effectiveness without harming downstream accuracy.

By Stefano Leggio, Giulio Rossolini, Alessandro Biondi
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

The paper "Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses" provides a comprehensive review of model inversion (MI) attacks that exploit trained deep neural networks to reconstruct private training data. It traces the evolution of MI from early machine‑learning contexts to recent DNN‑based attacks across various modalities and learning tasks, offering a detailed taxonomy and comparative analysis of both attacks and defenses. The authors also present an open‑source toolbox on GitHub to support further research in this area.

By Hao Fang, Yixiang Qiu, Hongyao Yu, Wenbo Yu, Jiawei Kong, Baoli Chong, Bin Chen, Xuan Wang, Shu-Tao Xia, Ke Xu
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Catch-Only-One: Non-Transferable Examples for Model-Specific Authorization

arXiv:2510. 10982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent AI regulations increasingly emphasize the need for mechanisms that preserve the utility of data for AI innovation while preventing misuse, particularly by enforcing purpose limitation in downstream AI applications.

By Zihan Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Zhongkui Ma, Shuofeng Liu, Akide Liu, Derui Wang, Minhui Xue, Guangdong Bai