arXiv:2609.05966v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Existing unlearning approaches typically rely on post hoc weight adaptation or distillation, leading to duplicated memory costs, degraded generalizatio...
By Kushal Chakrabarti, Mayank Baranwal
arXiv:2606. 03808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose PURGE, a machine unlearning algorithm built on a simple but an under-exploited observation: continual learning (CL) and machine unlearning (MU) which are fundamentally dual problems.
By Vedant Jawandhia, Daksh Ahuja, Ghufran Alam Siddiqui, Prashant Trivedi, Yash Sinha, Pratik Narang
arXiv:2606. 04067v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLMs become increasingly woven into everyday workflows, user queries sent to cloud hosted LLMs routinely mix task-essential content with task non-essential sensitive disclosures, yet type based PII redaction is context agnostic and may raise two issues: over disclosing untyped sensitive context and over removing answer bearing spans.
By Xinyue Huang, Xiaochun Cao, Wenyuan Yang
arXiv:2505. 12239v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In Continual Learning (CL), using a Pre-Trained Model (PTM) as the feature extractor has become a popular practice.
By Yajiang Huang, Jianheng Tang, Kejia Fan, Huiping Zhuang, Anfeng Liu, Tian Wang, Yunhuai Liu, Mianxiong Dong, Houbing Herbert Song
arXiv:2605. 07482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining.
By Zizhao Hu, Ameya Godbole, Johnny Tian-Zheng Wei, Mohammad Rostami, Jesse Thomason, Robin Jia
Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers...