arXiv Machine Learning By Haodong Wen, Kairong Luo, Tingkai Yan, Wenguang Chen, Kaifeng Lyu

Data Schedules and Learning Rate Schedules Should Be Designed Together

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates how the timing of introducing mid‑training (MT) data and the decay of the learning rate (LR) interact in large‑language‑model training. It shows that when the LR decays, mixing MT data earlier with pretraining (PT) data reduces final MT loss, whereas with a constant LR the opposite holds. The authors conduct ablation studies and propose a theoretical model explaining why the optimal data schedule depends on the LR schedule.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

How Should LLMs Consume High-Quality Data? Optimal Data Scheduling via Quality-Aware Functional Scaling Laws

The paper proposes a theoretical framework for scheduling high‑quality data in large language model training by extending functional scaling laws to account for time‑varying data quality. It identifies two regimes—noise‑limited and signal‑limited—where high‑quality data should be used differently, and introduces a Drop‑Stable‑Rampup training schedule that adjusts batch size at the quality transition. Experiments on 15B MoE and 600M dense models show significant accuracy gains over conventional decay schedules across multiple benchmarks.

By Zhitao Zhu, Xili Wang, Shizhe Wu, Jiawei Fu, Xiaoqing Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Always Learning, Always Mixing: Efficient and Simple Data Mixing All the Time

The paper introduces OP‑Mix, an on‑policy data mixing algorithm that operates continuously across pretraining, mid‑training, and instruction tuning. By simulating candidate mixtures through low‑rank adapters trained on the current model, OP‑Mix avoids separate proxy models and remains grounded in the model’s learning dynamics. Experiments show OP‑Mix consistently finds near‑optimal mixtures, improving pretraining perplexity by 6.3% and reducing compute for continual learning by 66–95% compared to baselines.

By Michael Y. Hu, Apurva Gandhi, Kyunghyun Cho, Tal Linzen, Pratyusha Sharma
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Demystifying Training-Time Augmentation for Data-Constrained Language Model Pretraining

The paper investigates training-time data augmentation as a regularizer for autoregressive language model pretraining in data‑constrained, compute‑abundant settings. It introduces three orthogonal augmentation categories—token‑level noise, sequence permutations, and target offset prediction—and shows through systematic ablations that each category delays overfitting and reduces validation loss, with random token replacement performing best individually. Combining augmentation categories further lowers the minimum validation loss, demonstrating that such augmentations mitigate data inefficiency in autoregressive pretraining.

By Michael K. Chen, Xikun Zhang, Fan Bai, Zhengding Hu, Zhen Wang
arXiv AI
Oct 26

Beyond Data Schedule: Fast LLM Pretraining on Data Mixtures by Loss-Reweighting

The paper introduces LARE, a method that adjusts domain weights during large language model pretraining by reweighting losses based on running loss statistics, rather than altering data exposure. Experiments on a 1.5B model trained with 240B tokens show that LARE improves performance across five benchmarks, achieving significant gains on GSM8K (+17.06 pp) and MATH (+9.00 pp). The approach demonstrates that balancing loss scales can enhance joint capabilities without increasing domain exposure.

By Jiazheng Li, Huaqing Zhang, Jing Xu, Tianle Cai, Jingzhao Zhang