arXiv:2606. 01221v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Imbalanced learning is a critical challenge in machine learning, where underrepresented target values can bias models and degrade prediction performance on rare but important cases.
By Shermin Shahbazi, Hossein Mohammadi, Mohsen Afsharchi
arXiv:2505. 13518v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Imbalanced datasets, where one class significantly outnumbers others, remain a persistent challenge in machine learning, often biasing predictions toward the majority class and degrading classifier performance.
By Behnam Yousefimehr, Mehdi Ghatee, Javad Fazli, Shervin Ghaffari, Zahra Rafei, Mohammad Amin Seifi, Sajed Tavakoli, Abolfazl Nikahd, Mahdi Razi Gandomani, Alireza Orouji, Ramtin Mahmoudi Kashani, Sarina Heshmati, Negin Sadat Mousavi
arXiv:2506. 01486v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Data imbalance persists as a pervasive challenge in regression tasks, introducing bias in model performance and undermining predictive reliability.
By Jelke Wibbeke, Sebastian Rohjans, Andreas Rauh
The paper introduces a collaborative optimization Boosting model for multiclass imbalanced learning that integrates density and confidence factors to create a noise‑resistant weight update mechanism and a dynamic sampling strategy. The modules are tightly coupled to coordinate weight updates, sample region partitioning, and region‑guided sampling. Experiments on 40 public imbalanced datasets show the model significantly outperforms seven state‑of‑the‑art baselines.
By Chuantao Li, Zhi Li, Jiahao Xu, Jie Li, Sheng Li
SAGE (Subpopulation-Aware Generative Enhancement) is a two-stage generative augmentation framework designed to mitigate spurious correlations in machine learning when group labels are unavailable. It uses cluster-derived sub-labels and class labels to fine‑tune a conditional generative model and text encoder, producing synthetic data that fills underrepresented regions and creates a balanced validation set for last‑layer reweighting. Experiments show SAGE improves worst‑group accuracy to 89.5%, 85.7%, and 79.1% on Waterbirds, CelebA, and MetaShift, outperforming existing group‑label‑free baselines by up to 7.7 percentage points.
By Yiming Luo, Rongqiang Zhao, Jie Liu
arXiv:2609.00093v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Imbalanced time series classification is often addressed by changing the training distribution, objective, logits, or final threshold. These interventi...
By Chuanhang Qiu, Yanran Xu, Yue Wang, Anthony Bagnall