arXiv:2608. 02643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) operate real desktop and web interfaces through screenshots, mouse and keyboard actions, and stateful UI feedback, yet their failures remain difficult to diagnose and repair.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 18754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agent failures are difficult to debug because the step where an error surfaces is often not the one that caused it.
arXiv:2607. 26041v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents (CUAs) increasingly act through desktop GUIs to complete long-horizon tasks.
arXiv:2607. 28802v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing evaluations often reduce agent failures to system-level outcomes, obscuring where the fault originated and which intervention would improve the agent system.
arXiv:2608. 02878v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have shown promise for automated Verilog RTL generation, yet state-of-the-art multi-agent systems plateau at ~95% accuracy on standard benchmarks.
arXiv:2606. 17929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-using agents drive real software through the screen -- clicking and typing -- but they solve every task from scratch: asked to repeat a task, an agent re-reads the screen, re-reasons every tap, and pays the full cost again.
arXiv:2608. 02352v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Native computer use offers a general interface for agents to operate almost any software available to people, but requires long-horizon state tracking, large-scale interactive experience, and learning from sparse yet verifiable outcomes.