arXiv Machine Learning By Mingda Qiao

Computational and Statistical Hardness of Calibration Distance

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates the computational and statistical challenges of the calibration distance, a key metric for measuring miscalibration in probabilistic predictors. It presents an efficient algorithm for exact computation when the distribution has a uniform marginal and noiseless labels, and shows that the problem becomes NP‑hard if either assumption is dropped. The authors also provide a polynomial‑time approximation scheme for the general case and establish tight sample complexity bounds for estimating the calibration distance from data.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

How fast can you find a good hypothesis?

arXiv:2509. 03734v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the hypothesis selection problem, we are given sample and query access to finite set of candidate distributions (hypotheses), $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1, \ldots, H_n\}$, and samples from an unknown distribution $P$, both over a domain $\mathcal{X}$.

By Anders Aamand, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Justin Y. Chen, Sandeep Silwal