arXiv:2404. 02039v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Game environments provide rich, controllable settings that stimulate many aspects of real-world complexity.
By Sihao Hu, Tiansheng Huang, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin, Yichang Xu, Zachary Yahn, Ling Liu
arXiv:2609.00474v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLMs are increasingly deployed as orchestrators that coordinate specialized subagents to solve complex tasks through natural language. However, in ma...
By Harini S I, Somesh Singh, Yaman K Singla, Rajiv Ratn Shah, David Doermann, Balaji Krishnamurthy
arXiv:2602. 04234v6 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) have emerged as a prominent paradigm for leveraging large language models (LLMs) to tackle complex tasks.
By Yuxuan Zhao, Sijia Chen, Ningxin Su
arXiv:2605. 12920v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Effective collaboration between embodied agents requires more than acting in a shared environment; it demands communication grounded in each agent's evolving understanding of the world.
By Vardhan Dongre, Dilek Hakkani-T\"ur
arXiv:2510.26915v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: While heterogeneous teams have typically been designed for well-specified missions with known semantics, generative intelligence, i.e., large...
By Zachary Ravichandran, Fernando Cladera, Ankit Prabhu, Jason Hughes, Carlos Nieto-Granda, Varun Murali, Camillo Taylor, George J. Pappas, Vijay Kumar
The paper presents a systematic mapping of recent chess research involving humans, engines, neural and reinforcement‑learning systems, large language models (LLMs), and hybrid approaches. It identifies 84 core study families and classifies them by agent type, strategic‑reasoning stages, and evaluation dimensions, highlighting a strong focus on situation assessment, evaluation, and action selection while noting gaps in planning, explanation, metacognition, and human–AI collaboration. The study also distinguishes hybrid systems by integration timing and cautions that improved human performance in evaluations does not automatically imply human–AI synergy.
By Paolo Ciancarini, Remo Pareschi