arXiv Computation and Language By Albert Qin, Jonathan D. Cohen, Gautam Reddy

Cognitive Maps in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) develop internal representations similar to cognitive maps used by animals for flexible behavior. Using relational reasoning tasks and causal mosaic experiments, the authors found that LLMs beyond ten billion parameters can infer unstated relationships, generalize to synthetic entity names, and form abstract relational structures that combine with entity identities. These relational representations are stored as pairwise links and composed retrospectively, mediated by a sparse, distributed key‑value system that can be perturbed to implant false memories and alter behavior predictably.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jul 2

NeuroCogMap Reveals Cognitive Organization of Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 00397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how complex cognitive functions are organized within artificial systems is central to interpreting large language models (LLMs) and relating them to biological cognition.

By Zhongxiang Sun, Haolang Lu, Qiang Ma, Qi Li, Qipeng Wang, Liang Pang, Chenyu Liu, Qiankun Li, Hao Sun, Kun Wang, Yi Zeng, Jun Xu, Guoqi Li, Ji-Rong Wen
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Discovering Structurally Plausible and Interpretable Cognitive Models with Large Language Models

The paper introduces DisCo, a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to automatically generate interpretable symbolic cognitive models. DisCo employs evolutionary search guided by two structural components: a Validator that filters out structurally invalid models and a Cleaner that enhances parameter identifiability by removing redundancies. Experiments on three behavioral tasks show that DisCo produces models with performance comparable to task‑specific baselines, and ablation studies highlight the Validator’s role in maintaining psychologically meaningful structure.

By Boyoung Kwon, Jiyoon Seo, Sang Ho Lee