Towards Data Science
Coding Agents Keep Shipping Silent Failures — Here Is How to Catch Them
Read the original on Towards Data Science →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Towards Data Science.
Related stories
Towards Data Science
Jul 31
How to Debug AI Coding Agents When They Change the Wrong Thing
A practical tutorial for recording model tool requests, real function results, patches, checks, screenshots, and a saved run log. The post How to Debug AI Coding Agents When They Change the Wrong Thing appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Towards Data Science
Aug 31
AgentOps Is Not MLOps: What Breaks in Your Monitoring Stack When Agents Go to Production
The article explains how the five core assumptions of MLOps monitoring are violated when agents are deployed to production, leading to inherited signals that incorrectly mark failed runs as healthy. It highlights the specific ways in which agent-based systems disrupt traditional monitoring stacks and the implications for reliability and performance. The piece serves as a warning for practitioners transitioning from MLOps to AgentOps, outlining the critical monitoring gaps that arise.
Simon Willison
Aug 22
More than just code review
The article discusses the essential skill of effectively instructing coding agents and verifying their changes. It highlights that while line‑by‑line code review is one method, it is not the most efficient way to validate software changes. The focus is on confidently guiding agents and confirming correct implementation without exhaustive inspection.
Towards Data Science
Oct 20
What's in the Box? Distinguishing Acceptable Traces from Unacceptable Ones
The article titled "What's in the Box? Distinguishing Acceptable Traces from Unacceptable Ones" discusses how to transform scattered requirements into deployable agents. It focuses on identifying which traces are acceptable and which are not for effective deployment. The piece was originally published on Towards Data Science.
Towards Data Science
Oct 27
An AI Agent Can Spot a Mistake and Still Not Fix It
The article describes an experiment where an AI agent was able to identify incorrect model decisions while interacting with a web page, yet failed to correct the errors. By replaying correct decisions through four intentionally flawed browser actions, the author demonstrates that a simple page check missed half of the erroneous clicks. This illustrates that detecting a fault and successfully recovering from it are distinct capabilities.
Towards Data Science
Oct 25
Agentic AI in Production: Why Your Agent Keeps Answering After Its Tools Fail
The article discusses how an agent can continue to produce confident answers even when its tools fail, leading to a misleadingly positive dashboard display. It highlights the issue of agents generating responses from nothing after tool breakdowns, which can create a false sense of reliability. The piece serves as a cautionary note for developers deploying agentic AI systems.