The paper systematically compares four classical machine learning models—SVM, ANN, CNN, and LSTM—with their quantum equivalents—QSVM, QNN, QCNN, and QLSTM—on simulated proton‑proton collision data from CERN Open Data. Classical models, especially CNN and LSTM, slightly outperform the quantum models under current hardware and dataset constraints, but quantum models achieve comparable accuracy with far fewer trainable parameters; for example, the QCNN matches a deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a depth‑three circuit. The study also shows that the regression task is non‑trivial for shallow polynomial fits, underscoring the relevance of the architectural comparison.
whyItMatters":"The work provides a realistic benchmark of classical versus quantum machine learning performance on high‑energy physics data, highlighting parameter‑efficiency advantages of quantum models for near‑term devices."
By Tariq Mahmood, Zain ul Abidin, Itzel Luviano Soto, Alfredo Raya
The paper compares classical and hybrid quantum machine learning models for a trigger-like binary classification task using CMS open data. Eight classical models (SVM, ANN, CNN, LSTM) and eight quantum counterparts are evaluated under identical preprocessing, data splits, and decision thresholds, with performance measured by accuracy, ROC‑AUC, F1‑score, precision, and recall. The best classical model is an artificial neural network (93.53 % accuracy, 0.9819 ROC‑AUC), while the best quantum model is a quantum convolutional network (90.89 % accuracy, 0.9731 ROC‑AUC), indicating that within an eight‑qubit budget the quantum models do not surpass the classical ones.
By Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Awais Rafique, Talab Hussain, Juan Pablo Perez Aguilar, Alfredo Raya, Muhammad Ahsan
arXiv:2510. 03389v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current quantum computers require algorithms that use limited resources economically.
By Jonas J\"ager, Philipp Els\"asser, Elham Torabian
arXiv:2602. 15751v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents an end-to-end demonstration of a viable, ultra-fast, radiation-hard machine learning (ML) application on FPGAs, which could be used in future high-energy physics experiments.
By Katya Govorkova, Julian Garcia Pardinas, Vladimir Loncar, Victoria Nguyen, Sebastian Schmitt, Marco Pizzichemi, Loris Martinazzoli, Eluned Anne Smith
arXiv:2605. 06734v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fast Weight Programmers (FWPs) encode temporal dependencies through dynamically updated parameters rather than recurrent hidden states.
By Kuo-Chung Peng, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen, Jiun-Cheng Jiang, Chen-Yu Liu, En-Jui Kuo, Yun-Yuan Wang, Prayag Tiwari, Andrea Ceschini, Chi-Sheng Chen, Yu-Chao Hsu, Chun-Hua Lin, Tai-Yue Li, Antonello Rosato, Massimo Panella, Simon See, Saif Al-Kuwari, Kuan-Cheng Chen, Nan-Yow Chen, Hsi-Sheng Goan
arXiv:2607. 29145v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum software engineering is an emerging research field focusing on efficiently embedding the quantum programming paradigm into existing software ecosystems.
By Piotr Malkowski, Domenik Eichhorn, Joshua Ammermann, Rinor Kelmendi, Nick Poser, Patrick Hopf, Ina Schaefer