arXiv AI By Fangfei Li, Chenyang Zhao, Long Wang, Feng Tian, Zhiyue Zheng, Lv Guo

CLAP: Closed-Loop Training, Evaluation, and Release Control for Domain Agent Post-training

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 01846v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Domain agents often face noisy business data, uncertain post-training gains, offline/application mismatch, and adapter-release risk.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 1

Agent Error Dataset: Scaling 50,000 Error--Diagnosis Pairs for Failure Analysis and Error-Aware Post-Training

The Agent Error Dataset (AED) presents 50,228 error–diagnosis pairs collected from 9,961 source tasks across 33 environments, 19 harness families, and 23 policy models in text‑based agent systems. A five‑stage Agentic Error‑to‑Training (AET) pipeline generates diagnoses and proposed corrections, verifies them against recorded evidence, and creates separate training views for diagnosis and actor recovery. Experiments show that first‑proposal corrections improve verifier pass rates from 18.4% to 51.1%, and fine‑tuning with full‑diagnosis data raises Qwen3‑8B’s exact‑step agreement from 47.2% to 63.6% on a holdout set.

By Kunlun Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Yibo Li, Cheng Qian, Beibin Li, Heng Ji
arXiv AI
Sep 18

FINSKILLOPS: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent System for SEC Filing QA

FINSKILLOPS is a multi‑agent system designed to improve SEC filing question‑answering after deployment by creating reusable skills from evidence‑grounded failure diagnoses. It manages these skills through targeted validation, regression checks, negative controls, and versioned replacement or retirement, ensuring that new patches do not introduce regressions. Across six benchmarks, a frozen skill registry outperforms other systems, and in a 12‑round operational study the system reduced the non‑correct rate from 20.0% to 12.5% while promoting only six of 33 proposed skills.

By Yanzhang Ma, Zhenghan Tai, Hanwei Wu, Sizhe Guan, Jianliang Lei, Hailin He, Chaolong Jiang, Jijun Chi, Tung Sum Thomas Kwok, Bohuai Xiao, Jingrui Tian, Xinlu Wu, Xingao Zhan, Peng Lu, Muzhi Li, Yihong Wu, Liheng Ma, Sicheng Lyu, Tianshuo Yan, Junhao Zhu, Yaqian Xu, Lei Ding, Yufei Cui, Ziquan Liu, Boyu Han, Hengli Liu, Ling Zhou, Xinyu Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 28

CARGO: Context-Aware Retrieval-Gated Evaluation of Agentic AI in Production

CARGO is a framework for evaluating agentic AI systems in production that addresses the problem of reference-instance divergence (RID), where reference-based judges penalize correct answers that involve different entity identifiers. It treats retrieved references as procedural exemplars, grounds judgments in the live instance’s context, assigns a three-way status to claims, and gates evaluation by retrieval confidence. Using the CARGO-Bench diagnostic suite, CARGO eliminates false penalties and improves discrimination while revealing a limitation in detecting procedural corruptions.

By Mukul Chhabra, Shail Patel, Luigi Medrano
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Evaluating human and LLM screening workflows in a conceptually complex scoping review: Recall--workload trade-offs and run-to-run consistency

The study compared human and large language model (LLM) workflows for title‑and‑abstract screening in a complex scoping review. Human reviewers and two GPT‑5.4 file‑batch runs retained 42.2‑45.0% of records with 82.3‑82.9% recall, while Gemini 3.1 achieved the highest recall (83.9%) but retained 56.7% of records. Identical GPT‑5.4 runs showed 91.7% agreement yet differed on 94 records, including 29 verified eligible ones.

By Nikol Figalov\'a, Lynn Huestegge, Anne B\"ockler-Raettig