arXiv AI By Qingyue Zhang, Huaze Tang, Minyu Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Wenbo Ding, Shao-Lun Huang

CB-Agent: Concept-Based In-Context Learning for Sequential Action Selection

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

JevSpawn: Adaptive Agentic Inference through Compositional Action Spaces

JevSpawn is a new compositional policy that links natural language task specifications to finite probabilistic exploration, enabling LLM agents to generate actions more efficiently. It uses parallel action spawning, feedback‑driven branch selection, representation revision, and recovery from retained alternatives to adapt actions during interaction. Evaluations on eight benchmark tasks show that JevSpawn outperforms seven agent baselines and a TypeSafe Jev variant, improving task performance and speeding navigation.

By Haoyang Su, Weiran Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

From Copying to Composition: How Language Models Develop In-Context Learning

The study investigates how language models acquire in-context learning (ICL) by distinguishing between copying a nearby demonstration and integrating information across a prompt. Across 17 models, roughly one-third default to copied answers, a few are undecided, and the remainder favor rule-consistent answers that yield higher accuracy and are guided by the requested value rather than the nearest conflicting example. Analyses show that models prioritize task-relevant prompt tokens before accuracy surpasses chance, and that synthetic or fine-tuned training can shift models toward compositional responses or improve accuracy when prompts reassign label meanings.

By Minglai Yang, Xinyu Guo, Renxiong Wang, Sunjie Hou, Daniel Yue Zhang, Yunzhong He
arXiv AI
Sep 28

Agentick: A Unified Benchmark for General Sequential Decision-Making Agents

Agentick is a unified benchmark for sequential decision‑making agents that evaluates RL, LLM, VLM, hybrid, and human agents on 37 procedurally generated tasks across six capability categories, four difficulty levels, and five observation modalities via a single Gymnasium‑compatible interface. It includes a Coding API, oracle reference policies, pre‑built SFT datasets, a composable agent harness, and a live leaderboard. An evaluation of 27 configurations and over 90,000 episodes shows no single approach dominates, with GPT‑5 mini leading overall, PPO excelling in planning and multi‑agent tasks, and the reasoning harness boosting LLM performance by 3‑10×, while ASCII observations outperform natural language.

By Roger Creus Castanyer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Glen Berseth