arXiv Statistics ML
Casewise and Cellwise Robust Tensor-on-Tensor Regression
Read the original on arXiv Statistics ML →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Statistics ML.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5
Robust Low-Tubal-Rank Tensor Completion under Cross-Concentrated Sampling
arXiv:2608. 03928v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tensor cross-concentrated sampling (t-CCS) bridges entrywise sampling and t-CUR slice-wise sampling by observing entries only within selected horizontal and lateral slices.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2
Cellwise and Casewise Robust Covariance in High Dimensions
arXiv:2505. 19925v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The sample covariance matrix is a cornerstone of multivariate statistics, but it is highly sensitive to outliers.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16
Localized Kernel Projection Outlyingness: A Two-Stage Approach for Multi-Modal Outlier Detection
arXiv:2510. 24043v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper presents Two-Stage LKPLO, a novel multi-stage outlier detection framework that overcomes the coexisting limitations of conventional projection-based methods: their reliance on a fixed statistical metric and their assumption of a single data structure.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 22
Generalized Least Squares Kernelized Tensor Factorization
arXiv:2412. 07041v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recovering incomplete multidimensional tensor-structured data is a fundamental task in many real-world applications.
arXiv Statistics ML
Sep 21
Robust Dual-Regularized Variable Selection under Outlier Contamination
arXiv:2609. 21342v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real data often contain unusual observations that can exert disproportionate effects on variable selection, especially in complex predictor settings.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23
Can We Predict Anomaly Detection Performance from Embedding-Space Geometry?
The paper investigates whether the performance of anomaly detection systems can be predicted without labeled anomalies. For kNN-based detectors, it derives a lower bound on AUC that links detection performance to the separation and variance of inlier and outlier scores, and uses this to analyze how density variation, intrinsic dimensionality, and domain mismatch affect score variability. The authors introduce pseudo‑anomaly probes that provide a reference for estimating relative score separation, and demonstrate through experiments on DCASE benchmarks that these probes enable anomaly‑free model selection to outperform conventional development‑set selection, especially under domain shift.