We introduce CARTE 1 (Culturally Anchored Regional-Territorial Evaluation), a multiplechoice benchmark for evaluating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform fine-grained reasoning over geographically grounded and regionally differentiated knowledge within France. While prior benchmarks focus on national-level cultural understanding, they largely overlook intra-country variation and the need to distinguish between closely related regional contexts.
The paper audits 51 recent multilingual evaluation benchmarks covering 242 datasets and 219 languages, focusing on coverage, representativeness, and rigor. It finds that while coverage is broad, many languages appear in only one benchmark and entire regions are underrepresented; low‑resource languages face a task equity gap. Representativeness is compromised by heavy reliance on English translations, and rigor is weakened by benchmark contamination and parallel‑corpus overlap. The authors propose concrete recommendations for building evaluation frameworks that are natively constructed, culturally grounded, contamination‑aware, and community‑aligned.
By Manan Uppadhyay, Himanshu Beniwal, Prashant Kodali, Sunayana Sitaram
The study evaluates how well large language models (LLMs) understand geographic lexical variation in Spanish across 21 countries, using an expert-curated database of 934 terms. Ten LLMs were tested with yes-no and multiple-choice questions, generating 10,164 and 16,637 items respectively, and performance was measured with F1 and adjusted Jaccard scores. Results show notable differences by model, country, and question format, with Spain scoring highest and Chile lowest, and suggest that digital resource availability and lexical distance from Spain influence performance.
By Yoshifumi Kawasaki
The paper audits 51 multilingual evaluation benchmarks covering 242 datasets and 219 languages, focusing on coverage, representativeness, and rigor. It finds that while coverage is broad, many languages appear in only one benchmark and entire regions are underrepresented, with low-resource languages evaluated on far fewer tasks than high-resource ones. The study also highlights that most datasets rely on English translations, creating artifacts and limiting cultural relevance, and that benchmark contamination through translation leakage and corpus overlap undermines rigor. Recommendations call for natively constructed, culturally grounded, contamination-aware evaluation frameworks that truly serve the communities they aim to assess.
The paper introduces TriviaRoomQA, a multilingual benchmark of 3,300 parallel multiple-choice questions across 288 topics, plus an additional 5,340 French-only questions. It evaluates 30 open-weight large language models (7–70 B parameters) from various regions, finding strong performance on knowledge-intensive subjects like history and geography but weaker results on everyday popular‑culture topics such as celebrities, music, movies, and news. The study also shows that model performance varies across languages for the same questions, indicating that factual knowledge access is not always language‑independent.
By Anna Mosolova, Djam\'e Seddah
arXiv:2606. 07422v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to answer culturally grounded questions across languages, yet it remains unclear whether local cultural knowledge is better accessed through English or the local language.
By Yang Zhang, Xiao Fei, Amr Mohamed, Sarah Almeida Carneiro, Mersin Konomi, Mingmeng Geng, Ahmed Asaad, Guokan Shang, Michalis Vazirgiannis