arXiv AI
Can We Trust AI Agents? A Case Study of an LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Ethical AI
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 18
ETHOS: Towards a Modular Ethics Framework for Clinical Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv:2608. 15424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of large language models has enabled the development of clinical multi-agent systems (MAS) capable of integrating multimodal patient data and supporting increasingly complex clinical decision-making.
arXiv AI
Jul 20
A Critical Analysis of Trustworthy AI Tools, Mark Frameworks, and the Implementation Chasms
arXiv:2607. 15480v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly impact society, ensuring their ethical and trustworthy deployment has become a global priority.
arXiv AI
3d ago
The Emergence of Social Science of Large Language Models
arXiv:2509.24877v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform hum...
arXiv AI
Aug 10
Taxonomy-Driven Analysis of Open-Source AI Risk Mitigation Tools
arXiv:2608. 07446v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in enterprise settings has introduced operational, security, and governance risks.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Evaluating the Impact of Explainable AI on Trust in AI-Assisted Code Review
arXiv:2607. 24601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate code review, but the reasoning behind their decisions remains hard to understand.
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Ethics Practices in AI Development: An Empirical Study Across Roles and Regions
arXiv:2508. 09219v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.