arXiv Computation and Language
Can Large Language Models Forecast What Researchers Study Next?
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 26
Thinking Like a Scientist? A Structural Study of LLM-Generated Research Methods
arXiv:2606. 26130v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to guide research methodology, yet their default methodological tendencies under minimal prompting remain unclear.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10
RAP: Research Attention Prediction Reveals Target-Conditioned Evidence Acquisition Biases
arXiv:2609.10092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as research agents, yet their ability to track shifts in research attention is difficult to evaluate be...
arXiv Computation and Language
23h ago
Can Language Models Learn to Forecast Stock Prices
arXiv:2609.36914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training has been shown to significantly improve language models' performance on tasks with verifiable outcomes, including mathematical reasoning,...
arXiv AI
Jul 14
Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs
arXiv:2604. 18576v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present the Bayesian Linguistic Forecaster (BLF), an agentic system for binary forecasting that achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ForecastBench benchmark.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9
What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness
Large language models fine-tuned for forecasting can be accurate yet poorly calibrated, and their chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning may not faithfully reflect the evidence behind a forecast. We ask whether internal representations offer a more direct window into both.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
GIScholarBench: Benchmarking LLM Overconfidence in GIS Research
arXiv:2606. 08036v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in academic research workflows, but scholarly tasks require high factual precision and therefore expose a key weakness: overconfidence.