Can Domain Generalization be Guaranteed in Small-Sample Learning?
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The paper investigates how many data samples per domain are needed for effective learning across multiple domains. It derives criteria from learning bounds that reveal an inverse linear relationship between the number of training domains and the required samples per domain, offering theoretical guidance for dataset adequacy and construction. The study also establishes a close link between in-domain learning and out-of-domain generalization through new generalization bounds.
arXiv:2606. 16883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generalization is a critical property of data-driven models, particularly deep learning models deployed in safety-critical applications.
arXiv:2606. 06855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While algorithmic stability is a central tool for understanding generalization of learning algorithms, existing high-probability guarantees typically rely on uniform boundedness or sub-Gaussian/sub-Weibull tail assumptions, which can be overly restrictive for modern settings with heavy-tailed or unbounded losses.
arXiv:2606. 06772v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Characterizing the optimization dynamics and statistical performance of over-parameterized deep neural networks (DNNs) remains a central challenge in understanding the remarkable success of deep learning.
arXiv:2303. 08777v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cross-validation is one of the most widely used tools for risk estimation and model selection in statistics and machine learning, yet its theoretical properties when embedded in a learning procedure remain insufficiently understood.
arXiv:2503. 07325v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Understanding and certifying the behavior of modern deep neural networks remains a fundamental challenge in reliable machine learning.