arXiv:2608. 01263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) samples trajectories from the current student policy and minimizes token-level divergence between student and teacher next-token distributions at prefixes along those trajectories.
By Leyan Xue, Feng Xiong, Mingjun Ma, Changqing Zhang
The paper introduces Contrastive Vision On‑policy Distillation (CV‑OPD), a method that enhances on‑policy distillation for vision‑language models by adding a contrastive divergence loss and a discrepancy‑aware gating mechanism. CV‑OPD contrasts teacher distributions from positive and negative visual crops, forcing the student to rely on genuine visual evidence rather than shortcuts. Experiments on fine‑grained visual benchmarks show that CV‑OPD reduces shortcut learning and improves visual reasoning across existing VLMs.
By Haowei Wang, Hao Lin, Qi Zhu, Jiayi Ji, Deyi Ji, Liujuan Cao, Rongrong Ji
arXiv:2609.23561v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deploying efficient neural networks is essential in resource-constrained environments, yet compact models often sacrifice interpretability - a critical...
By Aleks Czufarow, Ihor Babin
arXiv:2607.01630v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Dynamic expansion methods for class-incremental learning (CIL) protect task-specific knowledge by growing dedicated tokens or subnetworks, yet our...
By Bingchen Huang, Yifu Chen, Zhiling Wang, Yuanchao Du
Vision Transformers underperform convolutional networks when training data is scarce, and distilling convolutional inductive biases from a CNN teacher is an effective remedy that leaves the deployed model unchanged. General-purpose feature distillation, however, transfers little in this setting.
Dynamic expansion methods for class-incremental learning (CIL) protect task-specific knowledge by growing dedicated tokens or subnetworks, yet our analyses suggest that classification supervision alone does not sufficiently preserve task-agnostic shared backbone representations over long incremental sequences. We identify two intertwined challenges: cross-task confusion from sequential training on predominantly current-task data, which biases decision boundaries toward recent tasks; and under-optimized shared representations in the backbone that cap long-term discriminability as tasks accumulate.