arXiv AI By Benjamin Minhao Chen, Zhiyu Li

Beyond Accuracy: How Humans Evaluate Legally Correct but Socially Controversial Legal Advice from Machines

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 05680v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems are increasingly used to provide legal advice, raising questions about whether laypeople accept guidance from algorithms--especially when that advice is legally correct but socially controversial.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 6

Assessing and Explaining the Persuadability of Large Language Models as Legal Decision Tools

arXiv:2604. 26233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are proposed as legal decision assistants, and even first-instance decision-makers, across a range of judicial and administrative contexts, it becomes essential to explore how they answer legal questions, and in particular the factors that lead them to decide difficult questions.

By Oisin Suttle, David Lillis