EVOHARNESSBENCH is a new benchmark that tests how LLM-based agents handle changes in their tool, skill, and agent harnesses over time. It includes 17 deterministic harness streams with 802 tasks, 520 tools, 42 skills, and 62 agents, and evaluates agents in two settings: deployment evaluation and self‑evolving adaptation evaluation. The study finds that harness expansion can cause forgetting, adaptation gains are inconsistent, and preserving old competence does not always aid new capability adaptation, highlighting harness evolution as a distinct challenge for agent development.
By Zixuan Ke, Vaidehi Patil, Haizhou Shi, Yang Li, Ye Liu, Sarath Shekkizhar, Anurag Koul, Jiayu Wang, Xuan Phi Nguyen, Semih Yavuz, Mohit Bansal, Shafiq Joty
HarnessEvolve is a self‑evolving framework that improves agent harnesses—prompts, skills, tools, and execution logic—by learning from reference trajectories. It separates execution, evaluation, optimization, and gating into independent modules, addressing credit assignment failure, shortcut learning, and catastrophic forgetting. The approach uses reference trajectories to extract error signals, applies quality and performance gates to candidate updates, and validates updates on held‑out data, consistently outperforming state‑of‑the‑art baselines across diverse benchmarks.
By Wen Jiang, Mingmin Chu, Yimeng Tian, Qianxin Zhang, Haofei Yang, Rui Yang, Yang Liu, Tao Lv, Fangming Li
arXiv:2609.04280v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Modern LLM-based agents operate through a harness of tools, reusable skills, and specialist agents that shapes what they observe and what the...
By Zixuan Ke, Vaidehi Patil, Haizhou Shi, Yang Li, Ye Liu, Sarath Shekkizhar, Anurag Koul, Jiayu Wang, Xuan Phi Nguyen, Semih Yavuz, Mohit Bansal, Shafiq Joty
The paper introduces RuHarness, a framework that co‑evolves rubrics and harnesses to enable continual self‑improvement of autonomous agents that rely on large language models. RuHarness automatically discovers and reassesses behavioral criteria from execution trajectories, prioritizes unresolved weaknesses, and uses these insights to guide targeted harness updates while keeping the task objective unchanged. Experiments across varied agent tasks and backbone models demonstrate that RuHarness outperforms existing harness‑evolution baselines, especially on unseen held‑out tasks, and that its adaptive rubric prioritization supports sustained improvement and stable generalization over successive evolution rounds.
By Hao Chen, Yukun Yan, Ziyu Han, Ye He, Chuanzhe Guo, Shangzhan Li, Qi Shi, Qingfu Zhu, Maosong Sun, Wanxiang Che
arXiv:2606. 17546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-evolving LLM-based agents improve mainly by changing their agent harness: the structured execution layer around a base model, including prompts, memory, tools, middleware, runtime state, and the model-tool interaction loop.
By Congjie Zheng, Chuanyi Xue, Bin Liang, Jun Yang, Changshui Zhang
Evo$^2$ is a framework that jointly evolves a language model’s weights and its harness—the set of prompts, tools, and feedback mechanisms—using a dual-role pipeline where a single policy acts as both a Proposer and a Reflector. The training pipeline EvoTIDE combines supervised fine-tuning with interleaved GRPO to refine both roles based on harness edits and execution outcomes. Experiments on coding benchmarks show Evo$^2$ outperforms existing self‑evolution methods, achieving higher scores on Polyglot and SWE‑bench Verified, and its evolved harnesses transfer across tasks and models.
By Chejian Xu, Shujian Zhang, Wenxuan Zhou, John Lambert, Beck Chen, Bo Li, Andrew Hard, Rajiv Mathews