Institutional documents contain substantial amounts of operational and analytical information embedded within figures and tables. Current approaches for extracting visual content from documents are largely built around generic document layout analysis, where figures and tables are treated as uniformly relevant document objects rather than semantically meaningful analytical artifacts.
arXiv:2608. 15064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parsing visual documents into machine-readable representations is fundamental to document intelligence.
By Yuefeng Zou, Yichen Lu, Jingxiao Yang, Bingtao Fu, Gaoyang Zhang, Xiongfei Bai, Tian Chen, Xiang Qi
arXiv:2607. 29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata.
By Boyang Zhang, Adrian Lyjak, Eli Stewart, Zhaoqi Li, Simon Suo
arXiv:2607. 29124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific figures often encode the visual evidence behind scientific findings, yet figure plagiarism remains underexplored as a benchmarked multimodal evaluation problem.
By Zhiying Cui, Minghao Yang, Linlin Gao, Jie Liu, Pengyuan Li
arXiv:2607. 24745v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Key Information Extraction (KIE) is vital for many document applications, but creating training datasets is traditionally a time-consuming manual process.
By Siddartha Reddy, Harikrishnan P M, Goutham Vignesh, Varun V, Vishal Vaddina
arXiv:2607. 14117v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-version differencing of scientific documents is essential in scholarly publishing and technical documentation, but remains challenging because scientific documents are page-structured artifacts containing heterogeneous elements such as text, tables, formulas, figures, and layout cues.
By Zhen Yina, Wenkang An, Hao Wang, Keran You