The paper investigates which linguistic operations can be replaced by latent task representations instead of in‑context prompts. A 2.6 M‑parameter network learns to encode the geometry of a few‑shot support set and applies an additive update to a frozen GPT‑2 model, achieving zero‑shot performance comparable to or better than 10‑shot in‑context learning for forward inflection and lemmatization. However, for arbitrary pairings such as antonymy, the latent approach only reaches about half the performance of in‑context learning, indicating that productive rules amortize well while memorized pairings do not.
By Gunmay Jhingran
arXiv:2610.02391v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: When a large language model solves a mathematical problem, its reasoning is largely hierarchical, and the solution often branches at a few tokens where...
By Zeyong Zhang, Tung Sum Thomas Kwok, Tengfei Ma, Mengjia Xu
arXiv:2410.02343v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) routinely fail to output the correct option in multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) while encoding the answer int...
By Eduard Tulchinskii, Kristian Kuznetsov, Laida Kushnareva, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrei Andriiainen, Irina Piontkovskaya, Evgeny Burnaev, Serguei Barannikov
arXiv:2609.13534v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: We identify \textbf{Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics (HPD)}: for harmful prompts, the projection of the last-token hidden state onto a learned harm dir...
By Noor Islam S. Mohammad, Ulu\u{g} Bayaz{\i}t
arXiv:2609.14127v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We derive exact local responses for attention interventions, allowing candidate edits to be scored from a cached baseline and one backward pass. The...
By Julie Huang, Maggie Chlon, Gregory Gutin, Leon Chlon
arXiv:2607. 04222v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretability methods aim to reveal the features represented inside large language models (LLMs).
By Amit LeVi, Elad David, Max Fomin