arXiv Computation and Language By Jingfeng Chen, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Junlin Wang, Kaiwei Luo, Bhuwan Dhingra

Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization (ACPO) is a self‑supervised preference‑tuning method that improves factual accuracy in large language models without external supervision. It uses atomic consistency signals—agreement of individual facts across multiple stochastic responses—to identify high‑ and low‑quality data pairs for model alignment. ACPO outperforms a strong supervised alignment baseline by 1.95 points on the LongFact and BioGen datasets for Phi‑3 and Llama‑3 models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Evidence-Aligned Entity Verification for Hallucination Detection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The paper introduces Evidence-Aligned Entity Verification (EAEV), a method for detecting entity-level hallucinations in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). EAEV aligns generated entities with retrieved evidence across three dimensions and uses counterfactual stability analysis to maintain robust alignments when evidence changes. Experiments on multiple RAG benchmarks show that EAEV consistently outperforms existing hallucination detection methods and generalizes well.

By Runsong Jia, Zhen Fang, Mengjia Wu, Jie Lu, Yi Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

CALIBURN: Self-Calibrated LLM Unlearning Alignment

CALIBURN is a new approach to large language model (LLM) unlearning that measures a model’s confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses this measure to fine‑tune unlearning gradient updates. By doing so, it offers more precise control over what is forgotten while better preserving the model’s overall utility. Experiments on benchmarks such as MUSE and WMDP show that CALIBURN outperforms existing methods in balancing knowledge removal with utility retention.

By Zhengbang Yang, Yisheng Zhong, Junyuan Hong, Zhuangdi Zhu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 13

Do Factuality Methods Make LLMs More Factual? Reproducibility and Fair Comparison

The paper reproduces five factuality alignment methods for large language models—three on‑policy RL approaches (PPO, GRPO, Dr.GRPO) and two offline preference optimization methods (DPO, KTO)—using a common benchmark and evaluation metrics. None of the methods consistently outperforms the base model, and the rewards appear to favor format, length, or brevity rather than factuality or relevance. The study also highlights problems with current evaluation practices, noting that metrics and benchmarks often fail to measure prompt relevance and rely on fragile LLM judges and retrieval for verification.