arXiv Machine Learning
Articulation Upper Bounds for Language Models
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 14
Articulation Upper Bounds for Language Models
Language captures only a subset of the perceptions, intuitions and intents that form meaning between speakers. What, then, are the limits of language? We take steps towards measuring this in LLMs as f...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
How You Ask Shapes What You Get: A Theory-Seeded Measurement of Articulation in Advice-Seeking LLM Conversations
The paper investigates how the way users phrase advice‑seeking requests—termed articulation—creates stable, measurable patterns distinct from the topics of the requests. By analyzing 16,447 prompts from public chat corpora, the authors identify a small set of latent articulation factors that consistently appear across datasets and splits. One key finding is a long‑form, information‑poor style that leads language models to give shorter, vaguer answers without seeking clarification, a pattern that persists across topics and prompt lengths.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 15
Where Should Language Sit in a Multimodal Model? Lessons from What Language Does to Human Perception and Cognition
arXiv:2609.07474v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language models compute over tokens: language is their input, their output, and increasingly their internal representation. Whether language should...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18
Language Has Two Parameters: Narrative-Induced Semantic Plasticity and Phase-Sensitive Interpretation
The paper argues that language operates with two parameters: amplitude, which measures how often words co‑occur, and phase, a signed relational factor that determines how co‑activated meanings combine and can reverse a meaning’s contribution. Unlike amplitude, phase is not captured by standard word embeddings or transformer attention weights and is indexed to individuals and dyadic interactions. The authors propose six empirical predictions to test phase’s role and suggest that future language models should incorporate agent‑indexed, phase‑bearing semantic states.
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Social Meaning in Large Language Models: Structure, Magnitude, and Pragmatic Prompting
arXiv:2604. 02512v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit human-like patterns of pragmatic and social reasoning.
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5
Objects Without Morphisms: What LLMs for Mathematics Do Not Represent
arXiv:2610.03551v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have reached expert-level performance on competition mathematics largely through the volume of search placed around them:...